|
|
Post by cnote on Oct 1, 2023 11:34:58 GMT
This has to be the most talked about conspiracy just started watching it so can’t comment fully but I’m sure it’s going to get you 😂😂
|
|
|
|
Post by tonyhancock on Oct 1, 2023 12:24:18 GMT
This has to be the most talked about conspiracy just started watching it so can’t comment fully but I’m sure it’s going to get you 😂😂 It stinks. I'd say more than 50% of Americans know it stinks. We're supposed to believe WTC7 wasn't as well built as Grenfel  |
|
|
|
Post by tonyhancock on Oct 1, 2023 12:24:53 GMT
Easy searches
|
|
|
|
Post by tonyhancock on Oct 1, 2023 12:25:11 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by tonyhancock on Oct 1, 2023 12:27:09 GMT
Really ?
|
|
|
|
Post by choc on Oct 1, 2023 15:43:08 GMT
Here we go again 🤣🤣🤣🤣
|
|
|
|
Post by cnote on Oct 2, 2023 2:19:36 GMT
The only new revelation for me was learning how difficult it is to control a plane flying at 500 mph at low altitude with the precision it took to guide into a building.
Apparently it’s almost impossible to do it.
|
|
|
|
Post by choc on Oct 2, 2023 8:32:02 GMT
The only new revelation for me was learning how difficult it is to control a plane flying at 500 mph at low altitude with the precision it took to guide into a building. Apparently it’s almost impossible to do it. The impact speed was 440 mph and it was a rapid decent from 1000s of feet. They didn't fly for very long at the final altitude. |
|
|
|
Post by cnote on Oct 2, 2023 9:25:27 GMT
Even in the comments section below the vids you got lots of people saying it’s a very difficult task to execute at that speed.
It’s why a new theory has emerged for how it was done.
|
|
|
|
Post by cnote on Oct 2, 2023 9:40:33 GMT
You got to admit it’s fishy the explanation for building 7 😂😂😂
Some very strange anomalies.
|
|
|
|
Post by cnote on Oct 2, 2023 9:44:10 GMT
Yep very strange indeed. I’m actually pleased it’s back in the news tbh. Alex Jones, was my go to in the early 2000’s. |
|
|
|
Post by choc on Oct 2, 2023 9:47:19 GMT
Can't point you to it but there was a very good documentary made a few years after on why/how the buildings fell. It was all explained by top engineers and architects.
|
|
|
|
Post by cnote on Oct 2, 2023 9:49:38 GMT
Everybody I think should put their trust into orgs like:
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 justice.
|
|
|
|
Post by cnote on Oct 2, 2023 10:10:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by choc on Oct 2, 2023 11:38:25 GMT
And man didn't land on the moon.
|
|
|
|
Post by cnote on Oct 2, 2023 13:22:02 GMT
Can't point you to it but there was a very good documentary made a few years after on why/how the buildings fell. It was all explained by top engineers and architects. That’s what I like with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 justice. Everything they do to make their points are grounded in science and not opinion. It’s what people like you Choc, likes. I’m looking forward to seeing you challenge the findings of said org lol. |
|
|
|
Post by tonyhancock on Oct 2, 2023 14:25:17 GMT
Can't point you to it but there was a very good documentary made a few years after on why/how the buildings fell. It was all explained by top engineers and architects. That’s what I like with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 justice. Everything they do to make their points are grounded in science and not opinion. It’s what people like you Choc, likes. I’m looking forward to seeing you challenge the findings of said org lol. If he couldn't identify the blatant bullshit we were being belt fed two years ago, when it was being pointed out to him in real time, he's not going to question the official narrative about an event from 20 years ago. Sadly, well let's ask - Choc: Do you believe the government doesn't want all these third world young men, to be rocking up on our shores ? |
|
|
|
Post by tonyhancock on Oct 2, 2023 15:11:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by tonyhancock on Oct 2, 2023 15:22:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by choc on Oct 2, 2023 20:03:13 GMT
That’s what I like with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 justice. Everything they do to make their points are grounded in science and not opinion. It’s what people like you Choc, likes. I’m looking forward to seeing you challenge the findings of said org lol. If he couldn't identify the blatant bullshit we were being belt fed two years ago, when it was being pointed out to him in real time, he's not going to question the official narrative about an event from 20 years ago. Sadly, well let's ask - Choc: Do you believe the government doesn't want all these third world young men, to be rocking up on our shores ? 🤔 |
|
|
|
Post by tonyhancock on Oct 2, 2023 20:05:09 GMT
If he couldn't identify the blatant bullshit we were being belt fed two years ago, when it was being pointed out to him in real time, he's not going to question the official narrative about an event from 20 years ago. Sadly, well let's ask - Choc: Do you believe the government doesn't want all these third world young men, to be rocking up on our shores ? 🤔 Good |
|
|
|
Post by choc on Oct 2, 2023 20:06:03 GMT
Can't point you to it but there was a very good documentary made a few years after on why/how the buildings fell. It was all explained by top engineers and architects. That’s what I like with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 justice. Everything they do to make their points are grounded in science and not opinion. It’s what people like you Choc, likes. I’m looking forward to seeing you challenge the findings of said org lol. Can you explain in better English |
|
|
|
Post by cnote on Oct 3, 2023 3:03:18 GMT
Just watch their videos ( Architects and Engineers for justice 9/11) it’s perfectly articulated so that it’s easy for you and I to comprehend. Sorry for my poor grammar and communication.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2023 7:00:13 GMT
Building 7 was "pulled" Larry Silverstein made the call to "pull it and watch the building collapse" conveinent in the months leading up to 9/11 that the insurance policy was updated to cover terrorist attacks like he was told as the building owner that it was a terrorist target so there was advanced knowledge may not as much as a known date.
|
|
|
|
Post by choc on Oct 3, 2023 8:29:58 GMT
Just watch their videos ( Architects and Engineers for justice 9/11) it’s perfectly articulated so that it’s easy for you and I to comprehend. Sorry for my poor grammar and communication. 😁👍 |
|
|
|
Post by choc on Oct 3, 2023 8:30:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by cnote on Oct 3, 2023 8:46:34 GMT
I know we’ve had explanations for how the metal beams were melted but imo the questions were never answered properly.
The beams were a mixture of iron and steel. The two metals melt at significant different temperatures.
There are so many areas for discussion it really is the most interesting conspiracy theory.
I’m also having to factor in two other possibilities.
1. Remote controlled planes and
2. The crash was a massive hologram that was timed perfectly with the timed demolition.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2023 11:38:35 GMT
I know we’ve had explanations for how the metal beams were melted but imo the questions were never answered properly. The beams were a mixture of iron and steel. The two metals melt at significant different temperatures. There are so many areas for discussion it really is the most interesting conspiracy theory. I’m also having to factor in two other possibilities. 1. Remote controlled planes and 2. The crash was a massive hologram that was timed perfectly with the timed demolition. The buildings had to be weakened. I could have accepted a partial collapse to aroubd the impact zone. Also i thought the steel was galvanised with fire proof coat too. |
|
|
|
Post by tonyhancock on Oct 3, 2023 12:17:19 GMT
I was guessing from the emoji you were giving it some thought. |
|
|
|
Post by tonyhancock on Oct 3, 2023 12:53:10 GMT
Building 7 was "pulled" Larry Silverstein made the call to "pull it and watch the building collapse" conveinent in the months leading up to 9/11 that the insurance policy was updated to cover terrorist attacks like he was told as the building owner that it was a terrorist target so there was advanced knowledge may not as much as a known date. So. It's very easy to find pictures and film of tall buildings which have burned out to the shell, as my examples above. The don't fall down at all, let alone in installments, and within their own footprint. I would describe the state of WTC7 as having a few fires in it, as opposed to being on fire. We were initially told it was the 'heat' from the fire, which weakened (in the most convenient way) the metal structure. Now we have the well insured owner, who was well out of the way at the time, as was his family, telling us it was pulled (necessarily of course) which means controlled explosions, as what it looked like. So one way or another there's some Billy Bullshit, both explanations cannot be true. Which means more effort going into planning and planting the explosives, than putting out the fire (or starting it). Then of course there's the famous BBC reporter telling us the tower had 'collapsed', whilst it was still standing in the background. WTC7 collapsed due to being weakened in the attack on buildings just a 'few' hundred yards away. What was in there ? Only a secret CIA office (with now 'lost' documents, no doubt) www.cbsnews.com/news/report-cia-lost-office-in-wtc/What happened after ? Oh more government control, the Patriot act, and the invasion of Iraq, and the disposal of Saddam Hussein, who was sitting on a shit load of oil, and had rejected the USD hegemony. Was he involved in 911 ? Oh not in the slightest. There was however, a lot of money to be made from the war on terror (no-one in particular) What about this Osama Bin Laden guy, he could have clarified a few issues, what was his version ? His version is at the bottom of the sea. He wasn't going to be allowed to give his version Jesus wept. rumble.com/v3htr40-somebody-on-the-satanic-911-attack-team-fcked-up-big-time-by-putting-out.html |
|
